Wednesday, September 14, 2011

Never Getting Cloyed!


When I was in my high school I happened to get a Jiddu Krishnamurty book Freedom from the Known from my school library ("Wisdom Literature" is something that grudges to leave its hold on me even more than the fictional category). I was hooked by this lean, radiant, intense looking man with his sublime prose both in its texture and substance. All of them were his speech collections and the fact that he never professed a System or never asserted a Guru like role attracted me more. And I found some of his published "Notebooks" (which he didn't write it for publication but for his own sake) in which he recorded his daily sensitive observations and perceptions with photographic details and extreme incisiveness. For a long period of time I used to read it over and over. My father use to pinch my ears with a stern askance "Is it something that much 'incomprehensible' to read this same thing over and over?" He is of the opinion that one should be able to try different genres and different authors at the same time since it can trigger a deeper understanding with a better perspective. The "same thing' will stagnate one's mental growth preventing a wider acquaintance with other great pieces unless this "same thing" is something of utmost profundity (later he was convinced a bit that it's profound). I have considered his suggestion strongly and it has done me much good I guess if I exclude the fact that the stride from one author to another always takes much time like in the case of Krishnamurty Notebooks. I never get cloyed reading the same thing repeatedly until some new thing strike my taste by "serendipity". For the past few days I have been thinking over this matter and was trying to analyse why the hell am I doing that? This reading and relishing the same books again and again and again which I have read a couple of times before- watching the same movies which swept my feet off- hearing the same songs etc, when I have thousands of other books left in this world to be perused, movies to be watched for a new experience and songs to be heard for a new whiff? 


And then my mind got clicked in a thought -that's exactly what "good and classy" art is supposed to do-to make us go for it again and again. And that's why some of it fall under the "Canon" and widely acclaimed as "classics" or "great"! Some works have a matchless depth and myriad dimensions which leave space for further explorations. It even beats the callousness or fatigue by "familiarization". Art has a power to "defamiliarize" the ordinary and give things a new colouring  which we haven't noticed yet (as it is said in Lyrical Ballads) - Take the famous illustrative example of the painting Sunflower by Vincent van Gogh, which make us feel that we are seeing a sunflower for the first time in our life. But doesn't this defamiliarization after the first brush of familiarization get dimmed? The answer is often no. From each new read a distinct perspective may evolve, a new beauty which we have skipped or missed, a new meaning which was concealed somewhere at the first read. Take music. For instance a Karine Polwart song- I prefer to hear her exquisite pieces whenever I am in leisure since I can sense in them a perfect confluence of intellect, compassion and thawing music rendered with a peculiar tenderness cutting through us with her deep voice. She takes soft and unobserved themes and allow it to flourish in her songs. Each time I hear it a new feel gets added to it. Some music will unleash its beauty and its subtleties only after repeated hearings just like any other art. In Krishnamurty's Notebooks he described with a unique clarity the same trees, mountains, sky and birds and flowers but those seemed like different trees and flowers at each recording since he gave it a look from a fresh perception and state of conscience. So  I think my speculation prompts me to think that it's not a bad deal never getting cloyed with the same thing, if along with it I can be more vulnerable to get into new ventures rather than waiting my taste to get collide with a new thing by serendipity.


Age cannot wither her, nor custom stale her infinite variety. Other women cloy the appetites they feed, but she makes hungry, where most she satisfies.


                                                                        

18 comments:

  1. Well analysed.. guess most of us do this repetition anew. I can even cry reading a book.. Eliots's 'Mill on the Floss' makes me weep ; Shaw's 'Pygmalion' makes me laugh aloud; Gorkhy's Mother rejuvenates the rebel in me; every time i read .. Kishore Kumar and Jagjit Singh pains the lover in me; and my dear friends I m glued to, make me love them again and again..
    And at times I have re-read your writing .. Never getting cloyed! Love ya

    ReplyDelete
  2. Shaws pygmalion is a classic :) and i agree with that one should read many different authors and different genres...but still i cannot read romance :) nice analysis you did :)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Great post, You wrote it with a flair which is so unique and brilliant. Your choice of words and thoughts were so well knitted.

    ReplyDelete
  4. @Pygma: Pygmalion is one of the most delightful plays by Shaw...and it was indeed your name by it that lead me to your sweet blog! And yes George Eliot's psychological approach in her novels completely suits my tastes...thanks sweet...and one secret too...I never get cloyed reading some of your well analysed comments!:-)

    @Israr: Yeah me too think that the idea of different authors and different genres is a far better thing to do. Your last post appealed to me as a romantic comedy with a social relevance...so even if you don't read it you can put it nicely...for me it's difficult to put it inspite of the fact I read it a lot...thanks a lot:-)

    @Saru: Thanks you so much dear...what a fair appreciation...feels so delighted:):)

    ReplyDelete
  5. I do that sometimes. and each time i find something new.. good analysis! you portray things so beautifully that i feel looking for your post :)

    ReplyDelete
  6. That is very well written. perfect use of words. loved it :)

    ReplyDelete
  7. ohhhhhhhhhhh god iam so lte

    dear poetry analysisng mystery metherd i realy like it
    absolutly i love your works
    so keep write

    plz join my blog

    ReplyDelete
  8. @Niya: That's so sweet of you...so glad that you liked it...thanks Niya:-)

    @Bhagya: Thanks dear...am madly in love with words...:-)

    @Dilsha: Thanks Dilsha and yes I will surely join your blog:-)

    ReplyDelete
  9. I agree with lots of thing you said. Well observed post.

    Follow each other .

    ReplyDelete
  10. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Hi Nasnin, books, art and music, nice topic and you've nicely entwined them with each other. Totally agree that each new read of the old topic will create a distinct perspective... :)

    ReplyDelete
  12. @Izdiher: Thanks dear for the visit and the compliment:-)

    @Anand: Thank you so much Anand and so happy that you liked the post:-)

    ReplyDelete
  13. hmmm....nice post and I agree to your point....

    Will visit agian !

    ReplyDelete
  14. Aw.. how did I miss this..
    Well said, i agree totally, Hey I have felt the same way.. like the book grows with me.. every time I read it.. it gives me a different message.. that is a nice feeling.. thinking how I didnt understand this last time..!

    ReplyDelete
  15. @ Thinking: Thank you:-)
    @KP Dear: Yup! Thanks sweet! Take care and love you:-)

    ReplyDelete
  16. yeah welcome but I can not see the follow u avatar ;(.

    ReplyDelete